MTBhub.com  
     

Left Nav Sign up to join our community. Mark Forums Read Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   MTBhub.com > Tech Talk > Mechanical | Repair | Q&A

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2003, 04:51 PM   #1
tighter than lycra
Quasi's Avatar
 

165 175...which ones?

Aside from the clearance benefits, Can you really tell the difference between a165mm and 175mm as far as accelerating goes? I'm debating if I should go shorter or not.

push some wood
Quasi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2003, 04:54 PM   #2
F**k Bicycles...
Raacerx's Avatar
 


i can tell a difference on a hardtail. 165 seems to accelerate out of corners much better but 175 seems to be better for longer power pushes. Id get 165 since you seem to be into DJ and your mainly pedaling very fast for short periods of time.

ridin' faded for life
Raacerx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2003, 04:59 PM   #3
tighter than lycra
Quasi's Avatar
 


That's what I was thinkin too, I was looking for quicker acceleration. Thanks for the info...as always!

BTW, any benefits to 4 bolt as opposed to 5 bolt patterns? Strength doesn't seem to be a big deal as all the truvative's seem to be holding up fine?

push some wood
Quasi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2003, 10:48 PM   #4
Registered User
 


Quote:
any benefits to 4 bolt as opposed to 5 bolt patterns?
I've only ridden two crankarms: Race Face Next LP 5x110 175 square taper and TruVativ V-drive 4x104 175 ISIS. In all honesty I cannot determine if one is stronger than the other by the number of arms.

But consider this: within the boundaries of the sport of cycling, manufacturers have been less than resolute on setting unified industry standard specifications (cranks, bottom bracket, fork steerer diameter, to name a few.)

Race Face makes 5-arm cranks in "compact" 94outer/58inner and "standard" 110outer/74inner.
TruVativ and FSA make 4-arm 104/64.
Shimano spiders use 112/68 4-arm and 110/74 5-arm.

Race Face, TruVativ, FSA, and Shimano make XC and DH rings for their cranks. No problem right? But what if you want a Salsa, Jericho, AC, Vuelta, MRP or Spot chainring?

Short story. I get my TruVativ V-drive arms by mail and figure I could just pick up a 4x104 chainring at any LBS. I was wrong. I searched high and low. What I discovered was that 5-arm chainrings and shimano 4 or 5 arm rings are readily available at Mike's Bikes, Palo Alto Bicycles, WSBS, Performance Bike (RC), Calabasas, Garner's Pro Bikes... and finally found a Salsa 4x104 36T at The Off Ramp (Mtn View).

My suggestion? Pick a chainring and bash combo FIRST. How many teeth do you need? What ring makers have that number of teeth? What bash makers cover that ring? Select a crankarm SECOND. If I knew getting a hold of 5-arm rings was easier, I would have purchased a 5-arm crank instead of the 4-arm TruVativ I got for $20.

Only perceived benefit of 5-arm is chainring availability at your LBS (of course, this is not a guaranteed scenario. just my suggestion based on an experience locating a ring.)

-Dung

the bicycle enables max energy efficiency... http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ira/illi...nd_equity.html
wddung is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2009 MTBhub.com