MTBhub.com  
     

Left Nav Sign up to join our community. Mark Forums Read Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   MTBhub.com > General Discussion > Polls

Polls Ask for Opinions.

View Poll Results: 40 RC2 vs Boxxer WC
40 RC2 19 43.18%
Boxxer WC 19 43.18%
I'm in the middle: 50/50 6 13.64%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2007, 12:41 AM   #1
Registered User
reignrider's Avatar
 

40 RC2 vs Boxxer WC

No long explanations: just vote and state which one you ride (if it applies to you)...
reignrider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 12:46 AM   #2
Registered User
reignrider's Avatar
 


Fox 40 RC2
reignrider is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:21 AM   #3
Team SFO
BIGHIT8989's Avatar
 


I used to like the WC but i think i am leaning to the squishy plushiness of the 40. But i;d have to ride the WC again to have a FOR SURE answere. so for now my vote goes to the 40

Edit: I didn;t see the "i'm in the middle option" So i chose that

BIGHIT8989 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:35 AM   #4
Member
 


I used to have a boxxer wc and liked it.Never had a chance to try the 40 but im sure its a good fork too.
motomack86 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:46 AM   #5
Has Drain Bramage
gonefirefightin's Avatar
 


The Fox 40's adjustability is suberb to the world cup. even without changing springs



'06 Turner DHR

click it you pansy!!!
gonefirefightin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:59 AM   #6
Member
mikeG's Avatar
 


Boxxer WC has my vote
mikeG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 11:48 AM   #7
F**k Bicycles...
Raacerx's Avatar
 


boxxer world cup all the way. 40 is great...too bad it has 4x the problems that wc does and its heavier.

ridin' faded for life
Raacerx is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 02:48 PM   #8
J_B
Member
J_B's Avatar
 


I went with the WC for '07 and rode a 40RC2 in '06.

High/low speed compression never really seemed to matter on the 40.

Until There Is No Enemy. PHU
e.thirteen,EVOMO,IntenseCycles,Maxxis,ODI,SDG,661
J_B is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:01 PM   #9
Member
 


I roll with a 40, 32mm stanchions too skinny and the wc doesnt feel as buttery and plush. Less adjustability too.
max123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 07:23 PM   #10
Member
 


Quote:
Originally Posted by max123
the wc doesnt feel as buttery and plush
Mine felt sooo buttery and plush.Im not saying the 40 is a bad fork ,but that statement about the WC is totally false in my opinion.
motomack86 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:13 PM   #11
is wearing bibs
Rye Bread's Avatar
 


Quote:
Originally Posted by max123
Less adjustability too.

lets see, they both have high/low speed compression and rebound...sounds like exactly the same adjustments to me...And actually the WC is air sprung giving you infinite adjustability in that department, so you are just wrong.
Rye Bread is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:56 PM   #12
Registered User
 

The best

Fox 40s all the way
biker24 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 09:49 PM   #13
Member
 


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rye Bread
lets see, they both have high/low speed compression and rebound...sounds like exactly the same adjustments to me...And actually the WC is air sprung giving you infinite adjustability in that department, so you are just wrong.
The main reason I believe the 40 is more adjustable is because I think the adjustments work better on the 40.
max123 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 12:34 PM   #14
Tassoooooo?
Nemesis Gnat's Avatar
 


i cn adjust my wc from lock out to undamped spring... how its that not adjustable... and its smoother than any 40 ive ever ridden... anyone that claims a 40 is a better fork either rides for fox or jst says so because htey have one

and no offense firefighter dude, you still kick ass...

Downhill racing is not an extreme sport.

unless youre into that sorta thing...
Nemesis Gnat is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 04:36 PM   #15
is wearing bibs
Rye Bread's Avatar
 


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemesis Gnat
i cn adjust my wc from lock out to undamped spring... how its that not adjustable

owned

Tasso wins
Rye Bread is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2009 MTBhub.com